What to Expect From a Solana Smart Contract Audit
How a Solana program security review works, from scoping to the final report: what auditors need, how findings are rated and how to prepare.
By Blue Brick team · Published 26 September 2026 · 2 min read
If your Solana program will hold other people's money, a security review before launch is one of the best investments you can make. But many teams have never been through one. Here's how the process works, how to prepare so it goes faster and costs less, and what a review can and can't tell you.
How a review works
1. Scoping
The reviewer looks at the code's size and complexity and agrees exactly what's in scope: which programs, which commit, and which integrations. A fixed commit matters: reviewing a moving target wastes everyone's time.
2. Understanding the design
Before hunting bugs, reviewers need to understand what the program is supposed to do. Clear documentation here makes the rest faster and catches logic flaws, the bugs no tool can find.
3. Review
The core of the work:
- Manual, line-by-line review for access control, account validation, arithmetic, cross-program calls and business logic. See the most common Solana vulnerabilities.
- Automated scanning for known patterns and vulnerable dependencies.
- Testing and fuzzing the riskiest instructions with unexpected inputs.
4. The report
Each finding is written up with:
- A severity rating: typically critical, high, medium, low and informational.
- Where it is and how it could be exploited.
- A recommended fix.
5. Fixes and verification
Your team fixes the findings, and the reviewer checks each fix, then updates the report to show what's resolved. Don't skip this step: fixes sometimes introduce new bugs.
How to prepare
- Freeze the code you want reviewed and share the exact commit.
- Write a short spec: what each instruction does, who can call it, and what must always be true (for example, "the vault always holds at least the total staked").
- Include your tests. Good tests show intent and speed up the review.
- List known concerns. If you're unsure about something, say so.
- Remove dead code and unfinished features from scope.
Well-prepared code gets a faster, cheaper and more thorough review.
What an audit can't promise
A review greatly reduces risk; it doesn't make code guaranteed safe. Reviewers look at a specific commit, in a set time, with the information given. Protect yourself further with:
- A second review from a different team for high-value protocols.
- A bug bounty after launch.
- Monitoring and a plan for incidents.
- Safe upgrade authority, held by a multisig.
After the review
Publish the report (or a summary). It builds trust with users and investors, and shows you took security seriously.
Get a review
Our Solana security review includes manual review, automated scanning, fuzzing, a written report with severities, and verification of every fix. Building the program too? See our DeFi and program development.
Keep reading
Security
Solana Smart Contract Security: Common Vulnerabilities Checklist
The most common Solana program vulnerabilities, from missing signer and owner checks to unsafe CPIs, and how to prevent them before mainnet.
24 Sept 2026 · 3 min read
Web3 gaming
How to Build a Web3 Game on Solana: Architecture That Works
How to build a Web3 game on Solana: what belongs on-chain, player-owned items, in-game tokens, easy sign-in, session keys and real-time options.
26 Sept 2026 · 3 min read
Web3 gaming
Designing a Web3 Game Economy That Doesn't Collapse
Why so many play-to-earn economies collapsed, and how to design a Web3 game economy that lasts: sources and sinks, two-token models and testing.
26 Sept 2026 · 3 min read